Immigration Pot Leaks - Today's High Alert
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
There is not a doubt in my mind that the immigration bill now being taken up again by the U.S. Congress is part and parcel of an effort to advance what is called the North American Union,
I don't know what will happen with this bill, pushed off the floor of the Senate once already. But I do not wish for it to pass. It may pass, and it may pass the House as well and be signed into law. But, if so, it will just be one more sorry chapter in the ongoing power struggle between the West's "Anglosphere" - the monetary and power "elite" that seems to run Europe and America and have a say in many other places in the globe as well.
I have written numerous times about the North American Union, including my book "High Alert." The timeline I provided subsequently helped in the establishment of several anti-North American Union groups in Canada. In fact, FMNN has been one of the leaders in covering this insane plan which throws away the borders of three countries as if they never existed.
Thus, there exists a whole conversation - unbeknownst to too many - between the Anglosphere power elite and those anti-elite activist leaders, blogs and news aggregators such as FMNN about the North American Union.
The political elite wants to do things the way they were done in the 20th century, behind back doors at the "highest levels" - using massive regulatory powers to design a more perfect world in which borders finally fade. What's the hoped for end result? A merger, in one case, of Canada, Mexico and the United States.
It is not nuts. It is ongoing. In fact, WorldNetDaily.com recently reported that Henry Kissinger was going to deliver a study urging closer cooperation between the three countries. And Phyllis Schalfly has been "all over" this issue since the Council on Foreign Relations released the initial report. You can bet that closer cooperation is a code word for a de facto merger, sooner or later.
Still, there are plenty of people who will brand such talk as "conspiracy theory." But I think these same people would have said, 50 years ago, that talk of the European Union as a political rather the economic effort offered a similar silly approach to a "complex" issue. Well, "you've come a long way, baby!" It's not so complex anymore. The leaders of Europe are clear they want a "United States of Europe" and have long ceased to disguise the fact.
That's how the power elite operates. The goal is one world, and it needs to keep moving. It can move backward, fortunately, as well as forward, but all that momentum has got to go somewhere.
The Internet has exposed the power elite and continues to do so. You can see it in action. The North American Union is a good example. That's why this immigration debate is so funny and so sad at the same time. It's not about immigration. It's about acclimatizing U.S. citizens to ones from Mexico, and then Canada.
There are about 100 million Mexicans and 300 million "Americans." If you can get Americans to accept Mexicans as co-citizens, then you've virtually built yourself a bigger country. See, if you look at this way, it starts to fit together. For instance, Mexican trucks may soon be able to drive into and through the United States with a lot less regulatory difficulty. Why Mexican trucks? It's not really about Mexican trucks, at all. It's about making sure Americans gradually get used to less regulated or unregulated commerce across their borders. First it's trucks, then every other damn thing.
Now as a free-market person, you would think I'd be for the unlimited travel of Mexicans in America. I would be if it were private industry demanding it. But what we've got again, is certain private interests using government to re-jigger commerce and eventually citizenship in service of an agenda about which they are not being truthful. The immigration debate is just another tool in the implementation of this agenda, and it is anything but private. It's the worst kind of government botch job. It is because government can never do anything right/ I agree with the sentiment, but in this case I have my suspicions based on just how wretched this legislation actually is, Maybe, in fact, it's meant to be that way.
Look, let's me be blunt. The agenda of this President, in my opinion, is the agenda of his family's and of those around him who want to build a more centralized, international state. America, more than any other country stands between him and others who think his way. The only way to get to a unified world is to break America down. I think that's going on.
You break down America by trying to break down its rights and freedoms. You dissipate its military power, build up its enemies, ruin its currency. All this the Bush Administration has done or is on the way to doing. I even believe elements of the administration are hoping that a war with Iran will provide enough cover for them to get away with this agenda, or at least cover their tracks.
CNN's Lou Dobbs, who has covered the immigration issue very closely and courageously on CNN, often wonders aloud why this U.S. administration does what it does. But, Lou, it's not so hard to understand if you begin with the idea that America ought to merge with Canada and Mexico. Imagine the power that those in charge of central banking would have if a merger like that went through. Imagine the taxing authority, and the might of the military.
There are plenty of reasons that the political elite of the three countries would want to merge. But in the era of the Internet, they also have to let the electorate, or parts of it at any rate, know as well. On the other hand, they probably can't - because people would get mad, as they are. Instead, they have to come up with crazy bills like this immigration bill, and pretend that the political process churned it out, when the political process did nothing of the sort.
They are trying to "cook the frog slowly," but it is the era of the Internet. The pot has sprung a leak.
There is not a doubt in my mind that the immigration bill now being taken up again by the U.S. Congress is part and parcel of an effort to advance what is called the North American Union,
I don't know what will happen with this bill, pushed off the floor of the Senate once already. But I do not wish for it to pass. It may pass, and it may pass the House as well and be signed into law. But, if so, it will just be one more sorry chapter in the ongoing power struggle between the West's "Anglosphere" - the monetary and power "elite" that seems to run Europe and America and have a say in many other places in the globe as well.
I have written numerous times about the North American Union, including my book "High Alert." The timeline I provided subsequently helped in the establishment of several anti-North American Union groups in Canada. In fact, FMNN has been one of the leaders in covering this insane plan which throws away the borders of three countries as if they never existed.
Thus, there exists a whole conversation - unbeknownst to too many - between the Anglosphere power elite and those anti-elite activist leaders, blogs and news aggregators such as FMNN about the North American Union.
The political elite wants to do things the way they were done in the 20th century, behind back doors at the "highest levels" - using massive regulatory powers to design a more perfect world in which borders finally fade. What's the hoped for end result? A merger, in one case, of Canada, Mexico and the United States.
It is not nuts. It is ongoing. In fact, WorldNetDaily.com recently reported that Henry Kissinger was going to deliver a study urging closer cooperation between the three countries. And Phyllis Schalfly has been "all over" this issue since the Council on Foreign Relations released the initial report. You can bet that closer cooperation is a code word for a de facto merger, sooner or later.
Still, there are plenty of people who will brand such talk as "conspiracy theory." But I think these same people would have said, 50 years ago, that talk of the European Union as a political rather the economic effort offered a similar silly approach to a "complex" issue. Well, "you've come a long way, baby!" It's not so complex anymore. The leaders of Europe are clear they want a "United States of Europe" and have long ceased to disguise the fact.
That's how the power elite operates. The goal is one world, and it needs to keep moving. It can move backward, fortunately, as well as forward, but all that momentum has got to go somewhere.
The Internet has exposed the power elite and continues to do so. You can see it in action. The North American Union is a good example. That's why this immigration debate is so funny and so sad at the same time. It's not about immigration. It's about acclimatizing U.S. citizens to ones from Mexico, and then Canada.
There are about 100 million Mexicans and 300 million "Americans." If you can get Americans to accept Mexicans as co-citizens, then you've virtually built yourself a bigger country. See, if you look at this way, it starts to fit together. For instance, Mexican trucks may soon be able to drive into and through the United States with a lot less regulatory difficulty. Why Mexican trucks? It's not really about Mexican trucks, at all. It's about making sure Americans gradually get used to less regulated or unregulated commerce across their borders. First it's trucks, then every other damn thing.
Now as a free-market person, you would think I'd be for the unlimited travel of Mexicans in America. I would be if it were private industry demanding it. But what we've got again, is certain private interests using government to re-jigger commerce and eventually citizenship in service of an agenda about which they are not being truthful. The immigration debate is just another tool in the implementation of this agenda, and it is anything but private. It's the worst kind of government botch job. It is because government can never do anything right/ I agree with the sentiment, but in this case I have my suspicions based on just how wretched this legislation actually is, Maybe, in fact, it's meant to be that way.
Look, let's me be blunt. The agenda of this President, in my opinion, is the agenda of his family's and of those around him who want to build a more centralized, international state. America, more than any other country stands between him and others who think his way. The only way to get to a unified world is to break America down. I think that's going on.
You break down America by trying to break down its rights and freedoms. You dissipate its military power, build up its enemies, ruin its currency. All this the Bush Administration has done or is on the way to doing. I even believe elements of the administration are hoping that a war with Iran will provide enough cover for them to get away with this agenda, or at least cover their tracks.
CNN's Lou Dobbs, who has covered the immigration issue very closely and courageously on CNN, often wonders aloud why this U.S. administration does what it does. But, Lou, it's not so hard to understand if you begin with the idea that America ought to merge with Canada and Mexico. Imagine the power that those in charge of central banking would have if a merger like that went through. Imagine the taxing authority, and the might of the military.
There are plenty of reasons that the political elite of the three countries would want to merge. But in the era of the Internet, they also have to let the electorate, or parts of it at any rate, know as well. On the other hand, they probably can't - because people would get mad, as they are. Instead, they have to come up with crazy bills like this immigration bill, and pretend that the political process churned it out, when the political process did nothing of the sort.
They are trying to "cook the frog slowly," but it is the era of the Internet. The pot has sprung a leak.
No comments:
Post a Comment